Skip to content
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 alignment

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 alignment

Frameworks · ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · v2026.06 · Alignment matrix between ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A and Foundry’s policy library. Last refreshed June 2026.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 organizes Annex A into four themes totalling 93 controls: Organizational (37), People (8), Physical (14), and Technological (34). This page rolls up each theme and the standard’s main-body clauses (4–10) to the Foundry policy that satisfies them, with a status pill per group. This mapping is provided for transparency; it does not assert third-party certification.

Status
Implemented the control is in place and operating
Partially implemented part of the control is operating; the remainder is planned
Inherited satisfied by an underlying provider's control under BAA or agreement

Main-body clauses (4–10)

ClauseTopicFoundry posturePolicyStatus
4Context of the organizationFoundry’s context as an Indiana MSO supporting independent U.S. physician practices is documented in the security program overview. Interested parties (member practices, patients-via-practices, regulators, subprocessors) are enumerated.Program overviewImplemented
5Leadership & policySecurity Officer and Privacy Officer are named; the top-level policy statement is the security program overview. Leadership commitment is documented in the same policy.Roles & trainingImplemented
6Planning (risk, opportunities, objectives)Risk assessment and treatment runs quarterly per the risk-management policy. Security objectives are tracked alongside engineering OKRs.Risk managementImplemented
7Support (resources, competence, awareness, communication, documented information)Workforce training and policy communication are owned by HR & personnel security; documented information is maintained in this Trust Center plus internal runbooks.Roles & training, Policy managementImplemented
8OperationOperational planning & control is the day-to-day security program: change management, vulnerability management, incident response, vendor risk, and BCDR all run as documented processes.CCM, Vuln mgmt, IRImplemented
9Performance evaluationSystem-audit and monitoring policy defines metrics, monitoring cadence, and management review.System audits, Compliance auditsImplemented
10Improvement (nonconformity & corrective action, continual improvement)Nonconformities are captured as findings in the risk register or via incident response; corrective action plans are tracked to closure.Risk management, IRImplemented

Annex A controls: by theme

A.5 Organizational controls (37)

Control areaFoundry posturePolicyStatus
A.5.1–5.5 Policies, roles, segregation of dutiesPolicy library owned by the Security Officer; reviewed annually or on material change. Privileged actions require a second approver.Policy mgmt, Roles & trainingImplemented
A.5.7 Threat intelligenceThreat intel inputs (CISA, vendor advisories, AI/LLM-specific advisories) feed the threat-management hunt practice.Threat mgmtImplemented
A.5.8 Information security in project managementThreat modeling is mandatory for new features; secure SDLC checks gate merge.Secure SDLCImplemented
A.5.9–5.14 Asset inventory, classification, labelling, handling, transferHardware, SaaS, and data assets are inventoried; data is classified Public / Internal / Confidential / PHI with handling rules per class.Asset mgmt, Data mgmtImplemented
A.5.15–5.18 Access control (policy & lifecycle)Joiner/mover/leaver workflow; quarterly access reviews; least-privilege RBAC enforced at the API layer before requests reach the FHIR store.Access controlImplemented
A.5.19–5.23 Supplier relationships & cloud servicesVendor risk assessment before any subprocessor handles PHI; BAA required where PHI flows; SHA-pinned GitHub Actions and version-tag-pinned production container images bind the supply chain (content-digest pinning is a near-term roadmap item).Vendor risk, SubprocessorsImplemented
A.5.24–5.28 Information security incident managementIncident response runbook with named roles, severity scale, evidence preservation, and post-incident review.IR, BreachImplemented
A.5.29–5.30 ICT readiness for business continuityRTO/RPO targets for the clinical data plane, identity provider, and audit pipeline; AWS regional posture documented.BCDRImplemented
A.5.31–5.37 Legal, IP, records, privacy, documented proceduresRegulatory register tracks HIPAA, state breach laws, and applicable AI rules; records retention follows the data-management policy.Data mgmt, PrivacyImplemented

A.6 People controls (8)

Control areaFoundry posturePolicyStatus
A.6.1 ScreeningBackground checks before access to PHI-touching systems.HR & personnelImplemented
A.6.2 Terms & conditions of employmentConfidentiality and acceptable-use obligations are part of standard employment / contractor agreements.HR & personnelImplemented
A.6.3 Awareness, education & trainingAnnual HIPAA security and privacy awareness training at onboarding and on a yearly refresh, tracked to completion; AI-specific awareness is covered within it; phishing simulations. Role-based training for specialist functions is planned.Roles & trainingPartially implemented
A.6.4 Disciplinary processSanction policy documented; consistent application by HR.HR & personnelImplemented
A.6.5 Responsibilities after terminationConfidentiality obligations survive termination; access revoked same day.HR & personnel, AccessImplemented
A.6.6 Confidentiality / NDANDAs with workforce and third parties as appropriate.HR & personnelImplemented
A.6.7 Remote workingRemote-first workforce; baseline requires MDM-enrolled endpoints, FileVault, and no PHI on local disk.Endpoint & MDMImplemented
A.6.8 Information security event reportingAll workforce members can report events to security@bioscopefoundry.com; non-retaliation policy is part of HR.IRImplemented

A.7 Physical controls (14)

Control areaFoundry posturePolicyStatus
A.7.1–7.4 Physical security perimeter, entry, offices, monitoringPHI lives in Amazon Web Services data centers (inherited safeguards); Carmel, IN office holds no PHI media. Office entry is keyed and logged.FacilityImplemented
A.7.5–7.9 Protecting against physical & environmental threatsInherited from AWS for PHI systems; office threats covered by the facility policy.FacilityImplemented
A.7.10 Storage mediaNo removable PHI media; cloud-backed FHIR data only.Asset mgmtImplemented
A.7.11–7.13 Supporting utilities, cabling, equipment maintenanceLargely inherited from AWS for PHI workloads; not applicable to the Foundry office in any PHI-bearing capacity.FacilityInherited
A.7.14 Secure disposal or re-useMDM remote-wipe on decommission; asset register updated.Asset mgmt, MDMImplemented

A.8 Technological controls (34)

Control areaFoundry posturePolicyStatus
A.8.1–8.5 User endpoint, privileged access, identity, authenticationDoctor onboarding uses email magic links with short-lived sessions; workforce access to each console enforces the strongest MFA factor it supports (phishing-resistant WebAuthn passkeys preferred; enforced today on the AWS root account); SMS one-time codes prohibited for workforce.Access, NIST 800-63BImplemented
A.8.6 Capacity managementProvider-native autoscaling and quotas; capacity reviewed during BCDR exercises.BCDRImplemented
A.8.7 Protection against malwareEDR baseline on endpoints; container image scanning; sandboxed (Tier-4) execution for untrusted workloads.MDM, ThreatImplemented
A.8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilitiesDependency scanning; SHA-pinned GitHub Actions and version-tag-pinned containers (content-digest pinning is a near-term roadmap item); npm --min-age 7 cooldown; SLA-tracked patching.Vuln mgmtImplemented
A.8.9 Configuration managementInfrastructure as code (Terraform / Pulumi for AWS; Nix for host configuration); peer-reviewed change.CCMImplemented
A.8.10 Information deletionRetention schedules per data class; deletion or de-identification on schedule; BAA-driven return / destruction on offboarding.Data mgmtImplemented
A.8.11 Data maskingThe PHI redaction layer removes PHI before physician-facing sanitized surfaces are produced; agent worktrees and logs use machine-readable identifiers, not PHI content.AI governance, Data protectionImplemented
A.8.12 Data leakage preventionFHIR-only PHI boundary; egress controls on the healthcare network perimeter; outbound notification channels designed to avoid PHI payloads.Data protection, Security archImplemented
A.8.13 Information backupFHIR store backup and restore tested per BCDR; retention aligns with HIPAA’s six-year minimum for required documentation.BCDRImplemented
A.8.14 Redundancy of processing facilitiesAWS regional posture provides redundancy; object-storage exports replicate across regions for resilience.BCDRImplemented
A.8.15 LoggingCentralized audit logging with six-year retention; logs designed to record identifiers, not PHI content.System auditsImplemented
A.8.16 Monitoring activitiesDetection rules cover authentication, privileged access, and FHIR access anomalies; SOC-style triage rotation.Threat, System auditsImplemented
A.8.17 Clock synchronizationNTP via cloud provider; consistent timestamps across audit logs.System auditsImplemented
A.8.18 Use of privileged utility programsPrivileged utilities require named, MFA-gated access and produce audit trails.AccessImplemented
A.8.19 Installation of software on operational systemsSoftware baselines enforced through MDM and IaC; ad-hoc installation on operational hosts is not permitted.MDM, CCMImplemented
A.8.20–8.22 Network security, segregation, service securityNetwork perimeter controls around the healthcare account; tiered agent network (Tier-4 sandboxed workers cannot reach PHI); private connectivity for inter-service calls.Security archImplemented
A.8.23 Web filteringEndpoint web filtering through MDM.MDMImplemented
A.8.24 Use of cryptographyTLS 1.2+ in transit; AES-256 at rest under Foundry-managed AWS KMS keys; secrets in a managed broker; argon2id is the required hash where Foundry stores a password-bearing credential (Foundry is passwordless in practice).Data protectionImplemented
A.8.25–8.29 Secure development lifecycleThreat modeling; mandatory code review; OWASP Top 10 binding for web app code (see OWASP mapping); separated dev / test / prod environments; outsourced development under contract.SDLCImplemented
A.8.30 Outsourced developmentWhere applicable, third-party developers are bound by NDA and security requirements; code is reviewed before merge.SDLC, VendorImplemented
A.8.31 Separation of dev / test / prodProduction isolated by AWS account, IAM scope, and network policy; test fixtures use placeholders, never real PHI.Security arch, SDLCImplemented
A.8.32 Change managementIaC-backed change with independent review; emergency-change procedure documented.CCMImplemented
A.8.33 Test informationNo real PHI in non-production environments; synthetic or de-identified fixtures only.SDLC, Data mgmtImplemented
A.8.34 Protection of information systems during audit testingAudit and penetration-testing activities are coordinated with platform owners; sensitive systems get read-only access where possible.Compliance auditsImplemented